Flames of Dissent in the Himalayas: Statehood Protest in Leh Turns Deadly
On September 24, Leh — the high-altitude capital of Ladakh — awoke to chaos. A movement born of frustration over political neglect and constitutional ambiguity exploded into violence: protesters torched the local BJP office, attacked police vehicles, pelted stones, and clashed with security forces. In the aftermath, four people were confirmed dead and dozens were injured. A curfew was swiftly imposed as authorities struggled to restore order.
View this post on Instagram
At the heart of the unrest lies a long-simmering grievance: Ladakh has lacked a legislature since it was carved out as a Union Territory following the revocation of Article 370 in 2019. While many initially welcomed the change, locals argue they were left with a hollow promise—direct governance from New Delhi but without voice, representation, or constitutional safeguards.
Also read: Katrina Kaif and Vicky Kaushal Expecting First Child: ‘Best Chapter of Our Lives’
For weeks prior, a small cadre led by climate activist Sonam Wangchuk had maintained a hunger strike, pressing for formal talks with the Center over granting Ladakh statehood and bringing it under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. This status affords stronger local governance and protection of tribal lands. However, protests to date had largely remained peaceful. Wangchuk later described the flare-up as an “outburst” by frustrated youth, saying thousands had gathered quietly before a segment broke away and marched in anger.
View this post on Instagram
The day turned tragic when the protests morphed into chaos. Police responded with tear gas, baton charges, and live fire in some areas, sparking a deadly spiral. State officials and central authorities sought to pin blame on “provocative statements” and political scheming behind the scenes. The BJP claimed a Congress councilor was inciting violence—allegations denied by Wangchuk, who maintained that the momentum was spontaneous, borne of accumulated disenchantment.
Across Leh, structures burned and vehicles were ravaged. The BJP office smoldered, neighbors exchanged shocked glances, and security forces pushed to contain the unrest. In response, the district administration imposed Section 144 (prohibiting gatherings) and curfew orders. The annual Ladakh Festival, which draws tourists and local pride, was canceled midway.
Local and central leaders scrambled to wrest control of the narrative. In New Delhi, the Union Home Ministry asserted it had been “actively engaged” with Leh and Kargil protest bodies, citing multiple rounds of formal and informal meetings. In Leh, voices of grief mingled with anger: residents demanded not only recognition but accountability. In Kargil, protest groups expressed solidarity, calling the Leh conflagration evidence of the failure of the UT model.
Also read: Deepika Padukone Departs From Kalki 2898 AD Sequel: Producers Cite Lack of Commitment
Moving forward, the next round of talks between the Center and Ladakhi leaders is scheduled for October 6—though whether that meeting can quell the rising tide of unrest remains uncertain. Meanwhile, questions swirl: Can a fractured trust be repaired? Will New Delhi recognize the legitimacy of these demands? And can the line between protest and pandemonium be walked safely?
As Ladakh stands at an inflection point, one thing is clear: the fire in Leh is not just of burning walls, but of pent-up aspirations seeking constitutional shape in India’s high Himalayas.
Recent Post
