Supreme Court Revises Stray Dog Directive: From Shelter Relocation to Designated Feeding Zones

In response to public outcry and pressure from animal welfare groups, the Supreme Court of India has revised its controversial order regarding stray dogs in the Delhi-NCR region. The revised directive now emphasizes sterilization, immunization, and the establishment of specific feeding zones—marking a departure from its earlier stance, which mandated the relocation of all stray dogs to shelters.

From Relocation to Release after Treatment

The Supreme Court first told local governments on August 11 that all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR had to be moved within eight weeks and that homes had to be set up to house them. The broad nature of the order led to a lot of opposition. Animal lovers, NGOs, and regular people were worried about what would happen to the dogs and whether these shelters would be able to work.

The court made it clear in the new order that only wild dogs that have been diagnosed with rabies or that are acting aggressively will not be freed. All the other dogs should be spayed or neutered, given shots, and then put back where they came from.

Also read: Realme P4 Pro 5G Launches in India with Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and HyperVision AI at ₹24,999

Prohibition of Street Feeding, Mandated Feeding Areas

Crucially, the court prohibited the feeding of stray dogs on streets—warning that individuals found doing so may face legal consequences. Instead, local authorities must designate specific “feeding zones” where feeding is permissible. The court also directed the installation of notice boards near these zones, clearly indicating permissible areas for feeding.

Financial Contribution from NGOs and Individuals

The order stipulates that individuals and NGOs keen to participate in the process must contribute to creating the necessary infrastructure. Individual litigants must deposit ₹25,000, while NGOs are required to deposit ₹200,000 (₹2 lakh) with the court registry within seven days—failing which they will be barred from further participation in the proceedings. These funds will be utilised by municipal bodies to establish and maintain the required facilities.

National Policy Framework in the Works

At the same time, the Supreme Court has sent out letters to all states and Union Territories (UTs) asking them to send in ideas for a national strategy on stray dogs. This wider discussion is an attempt to create a consistent and humane framework across the country.

Also read: Shock at Jan Sunwai: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta Attacked, Stable After Scuffle.

Final Thoughts

The Supreme Court’s revised order walks a fine line—balancing public health concerns around stray dog bites with the welfare of animals and civic feasibility. Designated feeding zones represent a more controlled and humane approach to stray dog management, while insisting on sterilisation ensures long-term population control.

Requiring contributions from NGOs and individuals demonstrates a push toward shared responsibility—and yet, may also limit participation from smaller, underfunded organisations. As the dialogue shifts toward a national-level framework, it remains to be seen how effectively this model is implemented across varied urban and rural landscapes. If you can provide the BBC article content later, I’d be happy to integrate any additional perspectives or details!